Sangram Ghadage Represented by Power of Attorney - Ganesh Manohar Ghadage vs Dattatraya Chavan — 578/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070007352016
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
711/2016
Filing Date
22-09-2016
Registration No
578/2016
Registration Date
26-09-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sangram Ghadage Represented by Power of Attorney - Ganesh Manohar Ghadage
Adv. Sarade Dattatraya N
Respondent(s)
Dattatraya Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 578/2016 Sangram Ghadage v. Dattatraya Chavan The court allowed the petition filed by Sangram Ghadage (through his power of attorney) against Dattatraya Chavan regarding disputed agricultural land (plots 251/2 and 252, Pandharpur taluka). The court directed the taluka land records office to prepare complete survey records for both plots and ordered the respondent to submit necessary documents by 19.11.2018. The case involved a boundary dispute, with the respondent claiming government land existed between the parties' properties, but the court found insufficient evidence to support this claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 578/2016 Sangram Ghadage v. Dattatraya Chavan The court allowed the petition filed by Sangram Ghadage (through his power of attorney) against Dattatraya Chavan regarding disputed agricultural land (plots 251/2 and 252, Pandharpur taluka). The court directed the taluka land records office to prepare complete survey records for both plots and ordered the respondent to submit necessary documents by 19.11.2018. The case involved a boundary dispute, with the respondent claiming government land existed between the parties' properties, but the court found insufficient evidence to support this claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts