STATE BANK OF INDIA vs IMRAN HARUN SHAIKH — 611/2024
Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 16th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070007242024
e-Filing Number
02-12-2024
Filing Number
799/2024
Filing Date
06-12-2024
Registration No
611/2024
Registration Date
17-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Adv. DESHPANDE VINAYAK NARAYAN
Respondent(s)
IMRAN HARUN SHAIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Ex_Party Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-01-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State Bank of India v. Imran Harun Shaikh (611/2024) The court partially allowed State Bank of India's claim for recovery of Rs. 1,21,770 against respondent Imran Harun Shaikh, who had defaulted on a Rs. 10,00,000 agricultural loan sanctioned on 11.06.2021 at 12% annual interest. The court found the bank's documentary evidence (loan agreement, mortgage deed, and account statements) credible and established that the respondent failed to repay despite receiving legal notice on 06.05.2024. The court awarded the principal outstanding amount plus 13% per annum interest from the date of suit until full recovery, rejecting the respondent's defense as the case was decided ex-parte due to non-response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State Bank of India v. Imran Harun Shaikh (611/2024) The court partially allowed State Bank of India's claim for recovery of Rs. 1,21,770 against respondent Imran Harun Shaikh, who had defaulted on a Rs. 10,00,000 agricultural loan sanctioned on 11.06.2021 at 12% annual interest. The court found the bank's documentary evidence (loan agreement, mortgage deed, and account statements) credible and established that the respondent failed to repay despite receiving legal notice on 06.05.2024. The court awarded the principal outstanding amount plus 13% per annum interest from the date of suit until full recovery, rejecting the respondent's defense as the case was decided ex-parte due to non-response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts