Suwarna Shikare etcRepresented by Guardian -Sima Vishnu Shikhare vs Ayeshwarya Shikhare etc Advocate - Aradhye Umesh P — 560/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070007182016
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
698/2016
Filing Date
16-09-2016
Registration No
560/2016
Registration Date
23-09-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suwarna Shikare etcRepresented by Guardian -Sima Vishnu Shikhare
Adv. Chandanshive Priyadarshan P
Shubham ShikhareRepresented by Guardian - Sima Shikhare
Adv. Chandanshive P P
Shivam Shikhare
Adv. Chandanshive P P
Respondent(s)
Ayeshwarya Shikhare etc Advocate - Aradhye Umesh P
Surekha Shikhare
Vishnu Shikhare
Namdev Shikhare
Lochanabai Shikhare
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 07-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 560/2016 Summary: In this civil suit between Suvarna Shikhare & others (plaintiffs) and Ishwarya Shikhare & others (defendants), the court allowed the plaintiffs' application for production of documents on record, subject to their admissibility and proof at trial. The defendants' objection that the proposed documents were unverified xerox copies was rejected, as the court deferred the admissibility determination to the trial stage. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 560/2016 Summary: In this civil suit between Suvarna Shikhare & others (plaintiffs) and Ishwarya Shikhare & others (defendants), the court allowed the plaintiffs' application for production of documents on record, subject to their admissibility and proof at trial. The defendants' objection that the proposed documents were unverified xerox copies was rejected, as the court deferred the admissibility determination to the trial stage. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts