Machindra Maruti Wagh vs Sitaram Mahadev Dandage Advocate - Satale N. P. — 583/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070007082025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
29-11-2025
Filing Number
780/2025
Filing Date
01-12-2025
Registration No
583/2025
Registration Date
05-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Machindra Maruti Wagh
Adv. DESHMUKH DATTA SHIVAJI
Gorakh Maruti Wagh
Adv. DESHMUKH DATTA SHIVAJI
Sambhaji Maruti Wagh
Adv. DESHMUKH DATTA SHIVAJI
Tulshiram Maruti Wagh
Adv. DESHMUKH DATTA SHIVAJI
Rajvanta Balu More
Adv. DESHMUKH DATTA SHIVAJI
Vijaya Ambadas Achakal
Adv. DESHMUKH DATTA SHIVAJI
Respondent(s)
Sitaram Mahadev Dandage Advocate - Satale N. P.
Sagar Mahadev Dandage
Mangal Mahadev Dandage
Hari Shankar Wagh
Ganpat Shankar Wagh
Bhaskar Shankar Wagh
Laxmi Nagnath More
Avinda Dinkar Bombale
Sindhu Narayan More
Bhajandas Maruti Wagh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 583/2025 The court rejected the defendants' application to dismiss the plaintiffs' suit for declaration and injunction regarding disputed property. The defendants argued the suit lacked cause of action and that necessary parties were omitted, but the court found these grounds insufficient under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court held that the plaint clearly disclosed the cause of action—obstruction by defendants to plaintiffs' possession—and that questions regarding plaintiffs' legal rights and necessary parties require merit-based adjudication, not summary dismissal. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 583/2025 The court rejected the defendants' application to dismiss the plaintiffs' suit for declaration and injunction regarding disputed property. The defendants argued the suit lacked cause of action and that necessary parties were omitted, but the court found these grounds insufficient under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court held that the plaint clearly disclosed the cause of action—obstruction by defendants to plaintiffs' possession—and that questions regarding plaintiffs' legal rights and necessary parties require merit-based adjudication, not summary dismissal. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts