Prasad Ashok Khadilkar vs Shital Mohanlal Fade Advocate - Khiste Balkrishna K — 478/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070005802025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-10-2025
Filing Number
639/2025
Filing Date
04-10-2025
Registration No
478/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prasad Ashok Khadilkar
Adv. Dandage Laxman Dharmraj
Respondent(s)
Shital Mohanlal Fade Advocate - Khiste Balkrishna K
Rajendra Pavanlal Fade
Mahavir Hukumchand Fadiya
Adv. Khiste Balkrishna K
Hearing History
Judge: 10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Hearing
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 22-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 478/2025 Summary Court: 5th Joint Civil Judge & Joint Municipal First Class Court, Pandharpur Petitioner: Prasad Ashok Khadilkar Respondents: Shital Mohanlal Fade (Advocate), Khiste Balkrishna K, Rajendra Pavanlal Fade, and Mahavir Hukumchand Fadiya Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's applications (Civil Suit No. 05 and 25). The court ruled in favor of the respondents, finding that they have valid ownership and possession rights over their property. The petitioner's plea seeking to prevent the respondents from selling plots (31-34) created from a road adjacent to the petitioner's property was rejected. The court upheld a 2017 administrative order recognizing the road as part of the respondents' land, noting the petitioner failed to challenge this order timely or appeal it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 478/2025 Summary Court: 5th Joint Civil Judge & Joint Municipal First Class Court, Pandharpur Petitioner: Prasad Ashok Khadilkar Respondents: Shital Mohanlal Fade (Advocate), Khiste Balkrishna K, Rajendra Pavanlal Fade, and Mahavir Hukumchand Fadiya Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's applications (Civil Suit No. 05 and 25). The court ruled in favor of the respondents, finding that they have valid ownership and possession rights over their property. The petitioner's plea seeking to prevent the respondents from selling plots (31-34) created from a road adjacent to the petitioner's property was rejected. The court upheld a 2017 administrative order recognizing the road as part of the respondents' land, noting the petitioner failed to challenge this order timely or appeal it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts