Prasad Ashok Khadilkar vs Shital Mohanlal Fade Advocate - Khiste Balkrishna K — 478/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO070005802025

Hearing

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-10-2025

Filing Number

639/2025

Filing Date

04-10-2025

Registration No

478/2025

Registration Date

07-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Prasad Ashok Khadilkar

Adv. Dandage Laxman Dharmraj

Respondent(s)

Shital Mohanlal Fade Advocate - Khiste Balkrishna K

Rajendra Pavanlal Fade

Mahavir Hukumchand Fadiya

Adv. Khiste Balkrishna K

Hearing History

Judge: 10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR

27-04-2026

Hearing

24-04-2026

Order on Exh

22-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

03-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

27-04-2026
Order on T.I.

Case 478/2025 Summary Court: 5th Joint Civil Judge & Joint Municipal First Class Court, Pandharpur Petitioner: Prasad Ashok Khadilkar Respondents: Shital Mohanlal Fade (Advocate), Khiste Balkrishna K, Rajendra Pavanlal Fade, and Mahavir Hukumchand Fadiya Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's applications (Civil Suit No. 05 and 25). The court ruled in favor of the respondents, finding that they have valid ownership and possession rights over their property. The petitioner's plea seeking to prevent the respondents from selling plots (31-34) created from a road adjacent to the petitioner's property was rejected. The court upheld a 2017 administrative order recognizing the road as part of the respondents' land, noting the petitioner failed to challenge this order timely or appeal it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 478/2025 Summary Court: 5th Joint Civil Judge & Joint Municipal First Class Court, Pandharpur Petitioner: Prasad Ashok Khadilkar Respondents: Shital Mohanlal Fade (Advocate), Khiste Balkrishna K, Rajendra Pavanlal Fade, and Mahavir Hukumchand Fadiya Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioner's applications (Civil Suit No. 05 and 25). The court ruled in favor of the respondents, finding that they have valid ownership and possession rights over their property. The petitioner's plea seeking to prevent the respondents from selling plots (31-34) created from a road adjacent to the petitioner's property was rejected. The court upheld a 2017 administrative order recognizing the road as part of the respondents' land, noting the petitioner failed to challenge this order timely or appeal it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case