Lakshmi Sunil Jadhav vs Ranjana Rohidas Gaikwad — 441/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO070005182024

e-Filing Number

06-09-2024

Filing Number

570/2024

Filing Date

06-Sep-2024

Registration No

441/2024

Registration Date

21-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

4-3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lakshmi Sunil Jadhav

    Adv. SHINDE RANJEET NAMADEV

  2. 2.Sushant Sunil Jadhav,

    Adv. SHINDE RANJEET NAMADEV

  3. 3.Sandhyarani Father Sunil Jadhav

    Adv. SHINDE RANJEET NAMADEV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ranjana Rohidas Gaikwad

  2. 2.Mathurabai Devaba Jadhav

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 441/2024 Summary: In this perpetual injunction suit, plaintiff Lakshmi Sunil Jadhav sought production of documents via application (Exhibit 37), which defendants Ranjana Rohidas Gaikwad opposed. The court allowed the application, finding that denying document production would affect case merit and violate the natural justice principle of "audi alteram partem." No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  10. 19-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  11. 28-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  12. 11-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  13. 30-Jun-2025

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  14. 26-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  15. 26-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  17. 18-Jun-2025

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  18. 10-Jun-2025

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  19. 09-May-2025

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  20. 25-Apr-2025

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  21. 19-Apr-2025

    No W.S. Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  22. 11-Apr-2025

    No W.S. Order

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  23. 20-Mar-2025

    No W.S. Order

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  24. 04-Mar-2025

    No W.S. Order

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  25. 13-Feb-2025

    No W.S. Order

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  26. 27-Jan-2025

    No W.S. Order

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  27. 09-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  28. 04-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  29. 05-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  30. 15-Oct-2024

    Notice_Unready

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  31. 23-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 06-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 441/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 441/2024 Summary: In this perpetual injunction suit, plaintiff Lakshmi Sunil Jadhav sought production of documents via application (Exhibit 37), which defendants Ranjana Rohidas Gaikwad opposed. The court allowed the application, finding that denying document production would affect case merit and violate the natural justice principle of "audi alteram partem." No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case