Arun Mohan Nagtilak vs Balbhim Sadashiv Godse — 392/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070004622025
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
12-08-2025
Filing Number
507/2025
Filing Date
12-08-2025
Registration No
392/2025
Registration Date
19-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arun Mohan Nagtilak
Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO
Sita Arun Nagtilak
Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO
Vitthal Mohan Nagtilak
Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO
Deepak Vitthal Nagtilak
Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO
Devidas Suresh Adhatrao
Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO
Respondent(s)
Balbhim Sadashiv Godse
Ajinath Bhimrao Pawar
Sagar Balbhim Godse
Sandeep Balabhim Godse
Uttam Nivrutti Ghalke
Sarika Nagnath Nagtilak
Namdev Ajinath Nagtilak
Vishwnath Ajinath Nagtilak
Avinda Tanaji Nagtilak
Vinayak Tanaji Nagtilak
Shrikrishna Tanaji Nagtilak
Swati Tukaram Ghalke
Lata Tukaram Ghalke
Draupadi Nivruti Ghalake
Jotiram Tukaram Ghalke
Pandurang Lakshman Nagtilak
Mahadev Ganpat Nagtilak
Anita Pandurang Nagtilak
Siddheshwar Bhagwan Nagtilak
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Issues |
| 28-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 392/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for appointment of a court commissioner. The plaintiffs sought to appoint the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records, Pandharpur, as a court commissioner to conduct a local inspection of disputed properties in a perpetual injunction suit. The court found the application unmaintainable, holding that determining property boundaries was not a matter in dispute requiring local investigation, and that plaintiffs cannot use a court commissioner merely to collect evidence. The burden of proof remains on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 392/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for appointment of a court commissioner. The plaintiffs sought to appoint the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records, Pandharpur, as a court commissioner to conduct a local inspection of disputed properties in a perpetual injunction suit. The court found the application unmaintainable, holding that determining property boundaries was not a matter in dispute requiring local investigation, and that plaintiffs cannot use a court commissioner merely to collect evidence. The burden of proof remains on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts