Arun Mohan Nagtilak vs Balbhim Sadashiv Godse — 392/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO070004622025

Issues

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

12-08-2025

Filing Number

507/2025

Filing Date

12-08-2025

Registration No

392/2025

Registration Date

19-08-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38
IA/1/2025 Classification : Temporary - Interim Injunction Section Arun Mohan NagtilakBalbhim Sadashiv Godse

Petitioner(s)

Arun Mohan Nagtilak

Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO

Sita Arun Nagtilak

Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO

Vitthal Mohan Nagtilak

Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO

Deepak Vitthal Nagtilak

Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO

Devidas Suresh Adhatrao

Adv. KAWADE BALIRAM MAHADEO

Respondent(s)

Balbhim Sadashiv Godse

Ajinath Bhimrao Pawar

Sagar Balbhim Godse

Sandeep Balabhim Godse

Uttam Nivrutti Ghalke

Sarika Nagnath Nagtilak

Namdev Ajinath Nagtilak

Vishwnath Ajinath Nagtilak

Avinda Tanaji Nagtilak

Vinayak Tanaji Nagtilak

Shrikrishna Tanaji Nagtilak

Swati Tukaram Ghalke

Lata Tukaram Ghalke

Draupadi Nivruti Ghalake

Jotiram Tukaram Ghalke

Pandurang Lakshman Nagtilak

Mahadev Ganpat Nagtilak

Anita Pandurang Nagtilak

Siddheshwar Bhagwan Nagtilak

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR

02-05-2026

Issues

28-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

02-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS 392/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for appointment of a court commissioner. The plaintiffs sought to appoint the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records, Pandharpur, as a court commissioner to conduct a local inspection of disputed properties in a perpetual injunction suit. The court found the application unmaintainable, holding that determining property boundaries was not a matter in dispute requiring local investigation, and that plaintiffs cannot use a court commissioner merely to collect evidence. The burden of proof remains on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 392/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for appointment of a court commissioner. The plaintiffs sought to appoint the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records, Pandharpur, as a court commissioner to conduct a local inspection of disputed properties in a perpetual injunction suit. The court found the application unmaintainable, holding that determining property boundaries was not a matter in dispute requiring local investigation, and that plaintiffs cannot use a court commissioner merely to collect evidence. The burden of proof remains on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case