Kisan Kondiba Bhui vs Manik Sridhar Sawale Advocate - Dharurkar K.B. — 365/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO070004432024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

01-08-2024

Filing Number

486/2024

Filing Date

02-08-2024

Registration No

365/2024

Registration Date

12-08-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
IA/1/2024 Classification : Temporary - Interim Injunction Section Kisan Kondiba BhuiManik Sridhar Sawale

Petitioner(s)

Kisan Kondiba Bhui

Adv. DESHMUKH MADHAVRAO RANGRAO

Tuljaram Kondiba Bhui

Adv. DESHMUKH MADHAVRAO RANGRAO

Tulshiram Kondiba Bhui

Adv. DESHMUKH MADHAVRAO RANGRAO

Respondent(s)

Manik Sridhar Sawale Advocate - Dharurkar K.B.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR

29-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

11-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

19-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

21-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case 365/2024 Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application for condonation of delay (70 days) in filing the written statement, citing ill health/paralytic attack as the reason. Although no medical certificate was provided to support the claim, the court permitted the application to enable the defendant's participation in the trial. The defendant was ordered to pay compensatory costs of Rs. 200 to the plaintiff, after which the written statement would be recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 365/2024 Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application for condonation of delay (70 days) in filing the written statement, citing ill health/paralytic attack as the reason. Although no medical certificate was provided to support the claim, the court permitted the application to enable the defendant's participation in the trial. The defendant was ordered to pay compensatory costs of Rs. 200 to the plaintiff, after which the written statement would be recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case