Sidheshwar Londhe vs Maruti Kadam etc Advocate - Jadhav Vikas K — 346/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070004202016
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
413/2016
Filing Date
14-06-2016
Registration No
346/2016
Registration Date
20-06-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sidheshwar Londhe
Adv. Deshmukh Madhavrao R
Respondent(s)
Maruti Kadam etc Advocate - Jadhav Vikas K
Tanaji Kadam
Rajesh Kadam
Dhanaji Kadam
Adv. Jadhav Vikas K
Manisha Kadam
Anjana Kangude
Rajaram Kangude
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 346/2016 The court allowed defendants No.1, 2, 3, and 5's application to set aside the "no cross order" dated 09.12.2025. The adverse order was set aside, permitting defendants to conduct cross-examination of the plaintiff in this land encroachment suit. However, defendants were ordered to pay Rs.500 costs to the plaintiff on or before the next date as compensation for the procedural delay caused by their inaction and advocate's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 346/2016 The court allowed defendants No.1, 2, 3, and 5's application to set aside the "no cross order" dated 09.12.2025. The adverse order was set aside, permitting defendants to conduct cross-examination of the plaintiff in this land encroachment suit. However, defendants were ordered to pay Rs.500 costs to the plaintiff on or before the next date as compensation for the procedural delay caused by their inaction and advocate's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts