Dhanaji Kawade vs Ajit Kawade Advocate - Ghodake Manik N — 338/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070004162019
Filing Number
446/2019
Filing Date
22-07-2019
Registration No
338/2019
Registration Date
30-07-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanaji Kawade
Adv. Sarade Dattatraya N
Savita Kawade
Respondent(s)
Ajit Kawade Advocate - Ghodake Manik N
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decreed the suit in favor of Dhanaji and Savita Kawade (Plaintiffs), holding that defendant Ajit Kawade must pay Rs. 1,61,895 with 12% annual interest from July 2019. The plaintiffs, as guarantors for the defendant's Rs. 3,00,000 loan from a sugar factory, were liable when he defaulted; the sugar factory recovered the amount from their sugarcane bills, entitling them to recover it from the defendant under Section 140 of the Indian Contract Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court decreed the suit in favor of Dhanaji and Savita Kawade (Plaintiffs), holding that defendant Ajit Kawade must pay Rs. 1,61,895 with 12% annual interest from July 2019. The plaintiffs, as guarantors for the defendant's Rs. 3,00,000 loan from a sugar factory, were liable when he defaulted; the sugar factory recovered the amount from their sugarcane bills, entitling them to recover it from the defendant under Section 140 of the Indian Contract Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts