State Bank Of India through Manager Randhir Singh vs Mahesh Shinde — 279/2023

Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO070003322023

e-Filing Number

06-05-2023

Filing Number

356/2023

Filing Date

06-May-2023

Registration No

279/2023

Registration Date

06-May-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

7-4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Bank Of India through Manager Randhir Singh

    Adv. KARANDE SADANAND LAXMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh Shinde

  2. 2.Mangal Shinde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State Bank of India v. Mahesh Shinde & Mangal Shinde (279/2023) The court partially decreed the SBI's claim for recovery of ₹3,76,547.67 against respondents Mahesh and Mangal Shinde. SBI had advanced a vehicle loan of ₹10,00,000 at 9.75% annual interest on 05.03.2019, secured by a mortgage. After respondents defaulted despite legal notice, SBI filed suit for recovery. Finding the loan agreement and mortgage documents valid and undisputed (respondents appeared ex parte), the court held respondents liable for the entire outstanding amount including accrued interest at 10.75% per annum from suit filing until full payment, plus litigation costs. The court rejected respondents' request for executing a decree for property attachment and directed payment within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  14. 27-Jun-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur

  16. 04-Apr-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

  17. 21-Feb-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

  18. 09-Dec-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

  19. 19-Oct-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

  20. 10-Sep-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

  21. 26-Jul-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

  22. 23-Apr-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  23. 05-Apr-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  24. 23-Feb-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  25. 03-Jan-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  26. 09-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  27. 25-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  28. 28-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  29. 28-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

  30. 13-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 06-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 279/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State Bank of India v. Mahesh Shinde & Mangal Shinde (279/2023) The court partially decreed the SBI's claim for recovery of ₹3,76,547.67 against respondents Mahesh and Mangal Shinde. SBI had advanced a vehicle loan of ₹10,00,000 at 9.75% annual interest on 05.03.2019, secured by a mortgage. After respondents defaulted despite legal notice, SBI filed suit for recovery. Finding the loan agreement and mortgage documents valid and undisputed (respondents appeared ex parte), the court held respondents liable for the entire outstanding amount including accrued interest at 10.75% per annum from suit filing until full payment, plus litigation costs. The court rejected respondents' request for executing a decree for property attachment and directed payment within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case