State Bank Of India through Manager Randhir Singh vs Mahesh Shinde — 279/2023
Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 13th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070003322023
e-Filing Number
06-05-2023
Filing Number
356/2023
Filing Date
06-05-2023
Registration No
279/2023
Registration Date
06-05-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank Of India through Manager Randhir Singh
Adv. KARANDE SADANAND LAXMAN
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Shinde
Mangal Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th JT. CJJD JMFC PANDHARPUR PANDHARPUR
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Ex_Party Hearing
Ex_Party Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-01-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
| 16-01-2026 | Ex_Party Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State Bank of India v. Mahesh Shinde & Mangal Shinde (279/2023) The court partially decreed the SBI's claim for recovery of ₹3,76,547.67 against respondents Mahesh and Mangal Shinde. SBI had advanced a vehicle loan of ₹10,00,000 at 9.75% annual interest on 05.03.2019, secured by a mortgage. After respondents defaulted despite legal notice, SBI filed suit for recovery. Finding the loan agreement and mortgage documents valid and undisputed (respondents appeared ex parte), the court held respondents liable for the entire outstanding amount including accrued interest at 10.75% per annum from suit filing until full payment, plus litigation costs. The court rejected respondents' request for executing a decree for property attachment and directed payment within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State Bank of India v. Mahesh Shinde & Mangal Shinde (279/2023) The court partially decreed the SBI's claim for recovery of ₹3,76,547.67 against respondents Mahesh and Mangal Shinde. SBI had advanced a vehicle loan of ₹10,00,000 at 9.75% annual interest on 05.03.2019, secured by a mortgage. After respondents defaulted despite legal notice, SBI filed suit for recovery. Finding the loan agreement and mortgage documents valid and undisputed (respondents appeared ex parte), the court held respondents liable for the entire outstanding amount including accrued interest at 10.75% per annum from suit filing until full payment, plus litigation costs. The court rejected respondents' request for executing a decree for property attachment and directed payment within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts