Vishnu Pawar-5 vs Balu Asbe-13 Advocate - Naiknaware Dhananjay Jalindar — 700230/2010
Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070003162010
Filing Number
700230/2010
Filing Date
10-06-2010
Registration No
700230/2010
Registration Date
11-06-2010
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
6-2nd Jt. CJJD and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Petitioner(s)
Vishnu Pawar-5
Adv. Ghadage K. M
Vijay Pawar
Anada Pawar
Bharat Pawar
Arjun Pawar
Respondent(s)
Balu Asbe-13 Advocate - Naiknaware Dhananjay Jalindar
Sou.Swati Asabe
Mahadeo Gajare
Ganapat Asbe
Nana Salukhe
Tarabai Gajare
Ramchandra Pawar
Rakhamabai Gajare
Ushabai Sawant
Navanath Patil
Samarth Patil
Suresh Pawar
Sou.Sunita Salunkhe
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2nd Jt. CJJD and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 23-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 17-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 11-12-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The suit filed by Vishnu Pawar, Vijay Pawar, and Anada Pawar on 10/06/2010 was dismissed on 13/03/2026 after issues were framed on 23/12/2024. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to lead any evidence and were absent at the scheduled hearing with no adjournment application filed, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. Given the proceeding's age of over 10 years, the court dismissed the suit and ordered each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The suit filed by Vishnu Pawar, Vijay Pawar, and Anada Pawar on 10/06/2010 was dismissed on 13/03/2026 after issues were framed on 23/12/2024. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to lead any evidence and were absent at the scheduled hearing with no adjournment application filed, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. Given the proceeding's age of over 10 years, the court dismissed the suit and ordered each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts