Digambar Dagdu Bedare vs Ramdas Bhojling Bedare — 278/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO070003002025

W.S. and Say

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2025

Filing Number

334/2025

Filing Date

09-05-2025

Registration No

278/2025

Registration Date

23-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34
IA/1/2025 Classification : Temporary - Interim Injunction Section Digambar Dagdu BedareRamdas Bhojling Bedare

Petitioner(s)

Digambar Dagdu Bedare

Adv. KORAKE BALAJI MAHADEO

Gajanan Digambar Bedare / Apac Suvarna Digambar Beda

Adv. KORAKE BALAJI MAHADEO

Annasaheb Shamrao Bile

Adv. KORAKE BALAJI MAHADEO

Respondent(s)

Ramdas Bhojling Bedare

Hanmant Narayan Bedare

Vitthal Narayan Bedare

Baburao Bhojling Bedare

Dattu Dada Bedare

Sidram Dattu Bedare

Mahadev Dattu Bedare

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR

06-04-2026

W.S. and Say

25-03-2026

W.S. and Say

13-03-2026

W.S. and Say

05-02-2026

W.S. and Say

07-01-2026

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS 278/2025 The court allowed defendants 2-7's application for condonation of delay in filing their written statement in this perpetual injunction suit. The defendants cited unavailability of necessary documents as the reason for the delay. The court found the explanation sufficient, held that denying the opportunity to file would violate natural justice principles and affect case merit, and granted the application without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 278/2025 The court allowed defendants 2-7's application for condonation of delay in filing their written statement in this perpetual injunction suit. The defendants cited unavailability of necessary documents as the reason for the delay. The court found the explanation sufficient, held that denying the opportunity to file would violate natural justice principles and affect case merit, and granted the application without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case