Baban Tukaram Bagal vs Tukaram Dattu Bagal — 3/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 152. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

M.A.N.R.J.I. - Misc. Application not requiring Judicial Inquiry

CNR: MHSO070002702025

e-Filing Number

28-04-2025

Filing Number

303/2025

Filing Date

28-Apr-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

06-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

10-5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 152

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Baban Tukaram Bagal

    Adv. BAGAL VIKAS DEVIDAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tukaram Dattu Bagal

  2. 2.Shalan Tukaram Bagal

  3. 3.Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Bagal

  4. 4.Sourabh Dnyaneshwar Bagal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Baban Tukaram Bagal v. Tukaram Dattu Bagal (3/2025) The court partially granted petitioner Baban Tukaram Bagal's application seeking correction of a typographical error in the decree of Civil Suit No. 65/2022. The property description in the decree incorrectly named the village as "Palshi" when it should read "Palshi"; the court found this was merely a clerical/typing error that did not alter the decree's substantive effect. The correction was approved, and the matter was remitted to the original civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    R and P Ready

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    R and P Ready

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    R and P Ready

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    R and P Ready

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    R and P Ready

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  11. 02-Jan-2026

    R and P Ready

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  15. 18-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  17. 12-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  18. 08-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  19. 30-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  20. 21-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Pandharpur

  21. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 28-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Baban Tukaram Bagal v. Tukaram Dattu Bagal (3/2025) The court partially granted petitioner Baban Tukaram Bagal's application seeking correction of a typographical error in the decree of Civil Suit No. 65/2022. The property description in the decree incorrectly named the village as "Palshi" when it should read "Palshi"; the court found this was merely a clerical/typing error that did not alter the decree's substantive effect. The correction was approved, and the matter was remitted to the original civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case