Baban Tukaram Bagal vs Tukaram Dattu Bagal — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 152. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th April 2026.
M.A.N.R.J.I. - Misc. Application not requiring Judicial Inquiry
CNR: MHSO070002702025
e-Filing Number
28-04-2025
Filing Number
303/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baban Tukaram Bagal
Adv. BAGAL VIKAS DEVIDAS
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Dattu Bagal
Shalan Tukaram Bagal
Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Bagal
Sourabh Dnyaneshwar Bagal
Hearing History
Judge: 10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
R and P Ready
R and P Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | R and P Ready |
| 11-03-2026 | R and P Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Baban Tukaram Bagal v. Tukaram Dattu Bagal (3/2025) The court partially granted petitioner Baban Tukaram Bagal's application seeking correction of a typographical error in the decree of Civil Suit No. 65/2022. The property description in the decree incorrectly named the village as "Palshi" when it should read "Palshi"; the court found this was merely a clerical/typing error that did not alter the decree's substantive effect. The correction was approved, and the matter was remitted to the original civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Baban Tukaram Bagal v. Tukaram Dattu Bagal (3/2025) The court partially granted petitioner Baban Tukaram Bagal's application seeking correction of a typographical error in the decree of Civil Suit No. 65/2022. The property description in the decree incorrectly named the village as "Palshi" when it should read "Palshi"; the court found this was merely a clerical/typing error that did not alter the decree's substantive effect. The correction was approved, and the matter was remitted to the original civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts