Vasant Pawar vs vilas Pawar Advocate - Bagal Vikas Devidas — 700151/2013
Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070002382013
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
700151/2013
Filing Date
12-03-2013
Registration No
700151/2013
Registration Date
12-03-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Petitioner(s)
Vasant Pawar
Adv. Salunkhe Tukaram Bhujanga
Respondent(s)
vilas Pawar Advocate - Bagal Vikas Devidas
Rajkumar pawar
shrimati Vyajayanta pawar
Indubai patil
sou premal korke
Laxman pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 700151/2013 - Vasant Pawar v. Vilas Pawar Advocate & Others The court allowed Vasant Pawar's petition and directed that the ex-parte order previously passed against respondent No. 6 (Vilas Pawar Advocate) be set aside, granting him an opportunity to file his defense. The court imposed costs of Rs. 2,000 on respondent No. 6, payable within a specified timeframe. Upon payment of costs, the ex-parte order against respondent No. 6 shall be vacated and the main petition shall be considered on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 700151/2013 - Vasant Pawar v. Vilas Pawar Advocate & Others The court allowed Vasant Pawar's petition and directed that the ex-parte order previously passed against respondent No. 6 (Vilas Pawar Advocate) be set aside, granting him an opportunity to file his defense. The court imposed costs of Rs. 2,000 on respondent No. 6, payable within a specified timeframe. Upon payment of costs, the ex-parte order against respondent No. 6 shall be vacated and the main petition shall be considered on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts