Maruti Agavane vs Bhiva Pawar Advocate - Patil Sambhaji K — 180/2019

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Stayed by District Court. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Stayed by District Court Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO070002182019

Filing Number

241/2019

Filing Date

15-Apr-2019

Registration No

180/2019

Registration Date

17-Apr-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

4-3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maruti Agavane

    Adv. Shinde Ranjeet N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhiva Pawar Advocate - Patil Sambhaji K

  2. 2.Shankar Pawar

  3. 3.Arjun Pawar

  4. 4.Kaber Pawar

  5. 5.Madhukar Pawar

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Stayed by District Court

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  3. 20-Dec-2025

    Stayed by District Court

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  4. 10-Sep-2025

    Stayed by District Court

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  5. 03-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  6. 03-May-2025

    Hearing

    8Th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  7. 02-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  8. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  9. 30-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  10. 16-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  11. 02-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  12. 25-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  13. 28-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  14. 19-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  15. 25-Jul-2024

    Stayed by District Court

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  16. 19-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  17. 13-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  18. 08-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  19. 06-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  20. 21-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  21. 21-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  22. 28-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  23. 11-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  24. 08-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  25. 26-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  26. 20-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  27. 07-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  28. 12-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  29. 05-Dec-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 180/2019 Summary: Maruti v. Bhima and Others Maruti's application for court commissioner appointment to measure suit property (gat No.162) was rejected on 05.12.2022. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish grounds for local inspection under CPC Order 26 Rule 09, as the plaint alleged only fear of future encroachment rather than actual encroachment, contained no property identity dispute, and sought permanent injunction without claiming possession recovery or declaration of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  30. 05-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  31. 02-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  32. 02-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  33. 11-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  34. 20-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  35. 20-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  36. 27-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  37. 16-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  38. 13-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  39. 29-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  40. 25-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  41. 28-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  42. 22-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  43. 08-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  44. 18-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  45. 25-Oct-2021

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  46. 30-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  47. 26-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. Pandharpur

  48. 13-Jul-2021

    Hearing

  49. 27-Apr-2021

    Hearing

  50. 24-Mar-2021

    Hearing

  51. 17-Feb-2021

    Hearing

  52. 11-Jan-2021

    Hearing

  53. 09-Nov-2020

    Hearing

  54. 22-Sep-2020

    List of Witness

  55. 17-Aug-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  56. 10-Jun-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  57. 14-May-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  58. 26-Mar-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  59. 12-Feb-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  60. 21-Jan-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  61. 01-Jan-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  62. 13-Dec-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  63. 26-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  64. 19-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  65. 18-Oct-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  66. 12-Sep-2019

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  67. 06-Sep-2019

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  68. 16-Aug-2019

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  69. 24-Jun-2019

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur

  70. 22-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 15-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case 180/2019 Summary: Maruti v. Bhima and Others Maruti's application for court commissioner appointment to measure suit property (gat No.162) was rejected on 05.12.2022. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish grounds for local inspection under CPC Order 26 Rule 09, as the plaint alleged only fear of future encroachment rather than actual encroachment, contained no property identity dispute, and sought permanent injunction without claiming possession recovery or declaration of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case