Kisan Khare vs Laxman Gaikwad Advocate - Shinde Jalindhar B — 162/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070001962019
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
218/2019
Filing Date
04-04-2019
Registration No
162/2019
Registration Date
04-04-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kisan Khare
Adv. Bhadule B. V.
Tukaram Khare
Yuraj Khare
Pruthaviraj Khare
Satish Khare
Respondent(s)
Laxman Gaikwad Advocate - Shinde Jalindhar B
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 31-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 162/2019 The plaintiff Kisan Sopan Khare sought to set aside an order closing his evidence, citing his absence due to work-related duties. The court allowed the application, holding that denying the plaintiff opportunity to lead evidence in a perpetual injunction suit would violate natural justice principles and affect case merit. The previous order closing evidence was set aside, and the suit will proceed with the plaintiff permitted to lead further evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 162/2019 The plaintiff Kisan Sopan Khare sought to set aside an order closing his evidence, citing his absence due to work-related duties. The court allowed the application, holding that denying the plaintiff opportunity to lead evidence in a perpetual injunction suit would violate natural justice principles and affect case merit. The previous order closing evidence was set aside, and the suit will proceed with the plaintiff permitted to lead further evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts