Vishvanath Vasant Tathe vs Mandabai Yashwant Tathe — 155/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070001912021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
220/2021
Filing Date
31-03-2021
Registration No
155/2021
Registration Date
02-04-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishvanath Vasant Tathe
Adv. Koshti Ramling T
Respondent(s)
Mandabai Yashwant Tathe
Maruti Yashwant Tathe
Somnath Yashwant Tathe
Shobha Yashvant Tathe/ Shobha Balbhim Kale
Ramhari Sopan Tathe
Vasant Sopan Tathe
Yashwant Sopan Tathe(Legal Heir)
Laxman Sopan Tathe
Tanaji Sopan Tathe
Madhukar Sopan Tathe
Haridas Sopan Tathe
Hearing History
Judge: 10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Hearing
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 155/2021 - Vishvanath Vasant Tathe v. Mandabai Yashwant Tathe & Others The petitioner sought an interim order and final decree regarding a right-of-way dispute, alleging that respondent No. 3 was obstructing access to a road connecting his property. The court found the petitioner's application meritorious and ordered that a site inspection be conducted by the Court Commissioner to gather evidence about the obstruction. The petitioner's petition was allowed, directing the Commissioner to conduct a personal inspection and submit a report regarding the road access dispute before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 155/2021 - Vishvanath Vasant Tathe v. Mandabai Yashwant Tathe & Others The petitioner sought an interim order and final decree regarding a right-of-way dispute, alleging that respondent No. 3 was obstructing access to a road connecting his property. The court found the petitioner's application meritorious and ordered that a site inspection be conducted by the Court Commissioner to gather evidence about the obstruction. The petitioner's petition was allowed, directing the Commissioner to conduct a personal inspection and submit a report regarding the road access dispute before final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts