Ganesh Patil vs Mahadev Patil Advocate - Ranade S. K. — 140/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070001782016
Filing Number
160/2016
Filing Date
24-Feb-2016
Registration No
140/2016
Registration Date
01-Mar-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
7-4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ganesh Patil
Adv. Deshpande Subhash Nanasaheb
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahadev Patil Advocate - Ranade S. K.
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Issues
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
10-Feb-2026
Issues
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
09-Jan-2026
Issues
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
30-Sep-2025
Issues
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
28-Aug-2025
Issues
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
21-Jul-2025
Issues
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
10-Jun-2025
Issues
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
02-Apr-2025
Issues
-
20-Jan-2025
Issues
-
21-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
17-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
06-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
29-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
07-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
03-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
08-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
19-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
14-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
28-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
14-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
16-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
07-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
08-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
11-Oct-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
15-Sep-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
26-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
21-Jul-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
29-Apr-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
31-Mar-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
17-Feb-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
22-Dec-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
20-Nov-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
08-Oct-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
25-Aug-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
15-Jul-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
09-Jun-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
06-Apr-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
01-Mar-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Mar-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. 140/2016 (Ganesh Patil v. Mahadev Patil) The defendant's application challenging the adequacy of court fee stamp on the plaint was rejected. The defendant argued the suit properties for possession recovery were undervalued and insufficient court fee was paid under the Maharashtra Court Fee Act. The court held that valuation and court fee issues would be decided on the suit's merits during trial rather than at the preliminary stage, and declined to return the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Mar-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
19-Jan-2021
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
06-Nov-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
23-Sep-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
14-Aug-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
26-Jun-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
16-May-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
22-Apr-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
06-Mar-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
11-Feb-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
07-Jan-2020
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
22-Nov-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
04-Nov-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
17-Sep-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
29-Jul-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
13-Jun-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
03-Apr-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
22-Feb-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
28-Jan-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and J.M.F.C. Pandhaprur
-
05-Jan-2019
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
06-Dec-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
23-Oct-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
03-Oct-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
11-Sep-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
20-Jul-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
07-Jun-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
09-Apr-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
6Th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
30-Mar-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
14-Feb-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
19-Jan-2018
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
15-Dec-2017
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
24-Nov-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
16-Oct-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
07-Sep-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
20-Jul-2017
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
09-Jun-2017
First Order
-
10-Apr-2017
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
20-Mar-2017
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
23-Feb-2017
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
19-Jan-2017
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
20-Dec-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
29-Nov-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
08-Nov-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
10-Oct-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
23-Sep-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
19-Aug-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
19-Jul-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
20-Jun-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
28-Apr-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
29-Mar-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
07-Mar-2016
First Order
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
05-Mar-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 140/2016
Case Summary: R.C.S. 140/2016 (Ganesh Patil v. Mahadev Patil) The defendant's application challenging the adequacy of court fee stamp on the plaint was rejected. The defendant argued the suit properties for possession recovery were undervalued and insufficient court fee was paid under the Maharashtra Court Fee Act. The court held that valuation and court fee issues would be decided on the suit's merits during trial rather than at the preliminary stage, and declined to return the plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts