Shivam Anand Yalmar Gardian Archana Anand Yalmar vs Anand Murlidhar Yalmar Advocate - Shelake Vilas M — 131/2020
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070001582020
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
172/2020
Filing Date
18-03-2020
Registration No
131/2020
Registration Date
20-03-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivam Anand Yalmar Gardian Archana Anand Yalmar
Adv. Nayaku Dnyaneshwar Nana
Archana Anand Yalmar
Adv. Nayaku Dnyaneshwar Nana
Respondent(s)
Anand Murlidhar Yalmar Advocate - Shelake Vilas M
Trupti Dattatray Chougule @Trupti Murlidhar Yalmar
Adv. Patil Madhav Shrimant
Hearing History
Judge: 10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Hearing
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 02-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 28-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case 131/2020 Summary The court allowed petitioner Shivam Anand Yalmar's application (Case 113) and granted respondent Anand Murlidhar Yalmar's application (Case 116) to set aside an ex-parte order dated 06.01.2026 passed against him. The court found that respondent was not given an opportunity to be heard before the ex-parte order was issued and, following natural justice principles, set aside the order to allow both parties to present their arguments in the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 131/2020 Summary The court allowed petitioner Shivam Anand Yalmar's application (Case 113) and granted respondent Anand Murlidhar Yalmar's application (Case 116) to set aside an ex-parte order dated 06.01.2026 passed against him. The court found that respondent was not given an opportunity to be heard before the ex-parte order was issued and, following natural justice principles, set aside the order to allow both parties to present their arguments in the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts