Dharmendra Dhondiba Ghadage vs Balasaheb Ramchandra Ghadage — 170/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070001502024
e-Filing Number
02-03-2024
Filing Number
170/2024
Filing Date
02-Mar-2024
Registration No
170/2024
Registration Date
08-Apr-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
7-4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dharmendra Dhondiba Ghadage
Adv. SARADE DATTATRAYA NAVANATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balasaheb Ramchandra Ghadage
-
2.Mirabai Nagesh Umbrajkar
-
3.Sunanda Alias Laxmi Ravindra Hivrekar
-
4.Pratibhagiri Prasad Meharkar
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
23-Jan-2026
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
02-Jan-2026
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
22-Dec-2025
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
29-Oct-2025
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
25-Aug-2025
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
24-Jun-2025
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
16-Apr-2025
Awaiting Notice
4th Jt. Cjjd JMFC Pandharpur Pandharpur
-
26-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
-
25-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
-
10-Dec-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
28-Oct-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
19-Oct-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
17-Oct-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
10-Oct-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
20-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
09-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
04-Sep-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Sep-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Sep-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 170/2024 - Dharmendra Ghadage vs. Balasaheb Ghadage & ors. The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The plaintiff sought to add an injunction clause against defendant no. 5 (who acquired the property after original defendant no. 1's death during suit pendency). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy, noting that defendant no. 5 essentially stepped into defendant no. 1's shoes and the amendment did not fundamentally alter the suit's nature. Trial had not yet commenced, and no prejudice to the defendant was demonstrated. Costs of Rs. 400 were imposed on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
03-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
27-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
23-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
19-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
14-Aug-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
14-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
06-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
05-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
02-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
30-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
25-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
20-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
12-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
03-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
01-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
-
06-May-2024
Awaiting Notice
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
25-Apr-2024
Awaiting Notice
3rd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Pandharpur
-
15-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 170/2024
Case Summary: RCS 170/2024 - Dharmendra Ghadage vs. Balasaheb Ghadage & ors. The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The plaintiff sought to add an injunction clause against defendant no. 5 (who acquired the property after original defendant no. 1's death during suit pendency). The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real controversy, noting that defendant no. 5 essentially stepped into defendant no. 1's shoes and the amendment did not fundamentally alter the suit's nature. Trial had not yet commenced, and no prejudice to the defendant was demonstrated. Costs of Rs. 400 were imposed on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts