Mandoadari Kashid vs Audumbar Kashid Advocate - Bahirat B. A. — 111/2019
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 24th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070001302019
Filing Number
147/2019
Filing Date
05-03-2019
Registration No
111/2019
Registration Date
06-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mandoadari Kashid
Adv. Jadhav V.K.
Respondent(s)
Audumbar Kashid Advocate - Bahirat B. A.
Ranjana Bhakare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mandodari Kashid v. Audumbar Kashid (2026) The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for partition and perpetual injunction. The plaintiff, widow of a pre-deceased son, claimed a 1/3 share in agricultural property inherited by her mother-in-law under Hindu Succession Act Sections 14-15. The court held the property was the absolute personal property of the deceased mother-in-law (not joint family property), and upon her intestate death, devolved entirely to her living son and daughter (the defendants), excluding the plaintiff as she had no children and fell outside succession priorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mandodari Kashid v. Audumbar Kashid (2026) The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for partition and perpetual injunction. The plaintiff, widow of a pre-deceased son, claimed a 1/3 share in agricultural property inherited by her mother-in-law under Hindu Succession Act Sections 14-15. The court held the property was the absolute personal property of the deceased mother-in-law (not joint family property), and upon her intestate death, devolved entirely to her living son and daughter (the defendants), excluding the plaintiff as she had no children and fell outside succession priorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts