Subhash Holgundikar etc. 5 vs Ashok Dol Advocate - Gajare Manikrao Baburao — 700008/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 5. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHSO070000852015
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
700079/2015
Filing Date
04-02-2015
Registration No
700008/2015
Registration Date
05-02-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Holgundikar etc. 5
Adv. Joshi S. R.
Gururaj Holgundikar
Kanta Murugkar
Shrimati Shailaja Kodgali
Smt Kalawati Bhusekar
Respondent(s)
Ashok Dol Advocate - Gajare Manikrao Baburao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Dismissal Order
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 30-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 700008/2015 An execution petition based on a 2008 decree was filed in 2015 but remained pending for over 10 years with no substantive progress. The petitioner (DH) failed to lead any evidence of decree disobedience despite multiple opportunities, repeatedly citing age and hospitalization as reasons for absence. The court rejected further adjournment requests and an application for arrest warrant. On 28 April 2026, the court ordered the petition be kept for dismissal on the next date, warning that failure to take effective steps will result in dismissal for default, citing Supreme Court guidelines requiring execution petitions to be disposed within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 700008/2015 An execution petition based on a 2008 decree was filed in 2015 but remained pending for over 10 years with no substantive progress. The petitioner (DH) failed to lead any evidence of decree disobedience despite multiple opportunities, repeatedly citing age and hospitalization as reasons for absence. The court rejected further adjournment requests and an application for arrest warrant. On 28 April 2026, the court ordered the petition be kept for dismissal on the next date, warning that failure to take effective steps will result in dismissal for default, citing Supreme Court guidelines requiring execution petitions to be disposed within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts