Moreshwar Sampatti Zambare vs Balasaheb Mahadev Kadlaskar — 53/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070000672022
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
78/2022
Filing Date
20-01-2022
Registration No
53/2022
Registration Date
21-01-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Moreshwar Sampatti Zambare
Adv. Joshi S. R.
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb Mahadev Kadlaskar
Sachin Changadev Kadlaskar
Dattatray Bhimrao Kadlaskar
Dyaneshwar Bhimrao Kadlaskar
Pandurang Changadev Kadlaskar
Jijaba Dyaneshwar Kadlaskar
Baburao Shankar Kadlaskar
Eknath Mahadev Kadlaskar
Hearing History
Judge: 10-5th JT CJJD and JMFC PANDHARPUR
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 28-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-12-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 53/2022 Petitioner: Moreshwar Sampatti Zambare Respondents: Balasaheb Mahadev Kadlaskar and others Court: District Court, Pandharpur Date: 06/12/2022 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted the petitioner's relief sought under Order 39, Rules 1-2 of the CPC (temporary injunction). The court directed that: (1) the petitioner's petition be granted; and (2) the respondents are restrained from interfering with, obstructing, or trespassing upon the petitioner's property rights in the disputed land (Plot Nos. 328 and 316, Devde village, Pandharpur taluka). The court found the petitioner had established possession and rights to the land and ordered protection against further encroachment or disturbance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 53/2022 Petitioner: Moreshwar Sampatti Zambare Respondents: Balasaheb Mahadev Kadlaskar and others Court: District Court, Pandharpur Date: 06/12/2022 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted the petitioner's relief sought under Order 39, Rules 1-2 of the CPC (temporary injunction). The court directed that: (1) the petitioner's petition be granted; and (2) the respondents are restrained from interfering with, obstructing, or trespassing upon the petitioner's property rights in the disputed land (Plot Nos. 328 and 316, Devde village, Pandharpur taluka). The court found the petitioner had established possession and rights to the land and ordered protection against further encroachment or disturbance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts