Chitra Bhosale vs Bajarang @ Kakasaheb Bhosale Advocate - Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao — 55/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070000652019
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
76/2019
Filing Date
30-01-2019
Registration No
55/2019
Registration Date
02-02-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chitra Bhosale
Adv. Bhosale Bharat D.
Respondent(s)
Bajarang @ Kakasaheb Bhosale Advocate - Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao
Ashok Bhosale
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 55/2019 - Chitra Mohan Bhosale v. Bajarang Tukaram Bhosale The court allowed plaintiff Chitra Bhosale's application to set aside the evidence closure order and permitted her to lead further evidence in this perpetual injunction suit. The court found that denying the plaintiff this opportunity would affect case merit and violate natural justice principles (audi alteram partem). Despite the defendant's strong objections, the court determined the plaintiff's reasons were sufficient and circumstances were beyond her control. The suit will now proceed with the plaintiff presenting additional evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 55/2019 - Chitra Mohan Bhosale v. Bajarang Tukaram Bhosale The court allowed plaintiff Chitra Bhosale's application to set aside the evidence closure order and permitted her to lead further evidence in this perpetual injunction suit. The court found that denying the plaintiff this opportunity would affect case merit and violate natural justice principles (audi alteram partem). Despite the defendant's strong objections, the court determined the plaintiff's reasons were sufficient and circumstances were beyond her control. The suit will now proceed with the plaintiff presenting additional evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts