Dhananjay Dilip Pandhe vs Sachiv Pandhaprur Education Society — 55/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070000432025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
14-01-2025
Filing Number
42/2025
Filing Date
14-01-2025
Registration No
55/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhananjay Dilip Pandhe
Adv. THORAT BALASAHEB SHRIMANT
Respondent(s)
Sachiv Pandhaprur Education Society
Pracharya Adhyapak Vidyalay
Manoj Karansingh Padavi
Adv. Ranade S. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 55/2025 The court allowed Defendant No. 2's application to set aside the ex-parte order passed against him on 19.06.2025, despite a delay of 6 months and 3 days in filing his written statement. The court found his reasons reasonable (document unavailability and heavy workload as Principal) and deemed his presence necessary to decide the plaintiff's reinstatement claim on merit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 55/2025 The court allowed Defendant No. 2's application to set aside the ex-parte order passed against him on 19.06.2025, despite a delay of 6 months and 3 days in filing his written statement. The court found his reasons reasonable (document unavailability and heavy workload as Principal) and deemed his presence necessary to decide the plaintiff's reinstatement claim on merit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts