Anil Nale vs Shivaji Mali Advocate - Shikare D.M. — 5/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition

CNR: MHSO070000262018

Hearing

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

38/2018

Filing Date

11-01-2018

Registration No

5/2018

Registration Date

15-01-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur

Judge

1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9
IA/1/2022 Classification : Interrogatories Section Shivaji MaliAnil Nale
IA/2/2022 Classification : Interrogatories Section Shivaji MaliAnil Nale

Petitioner(s)

Anil Nale

Adv. Gandhi Sarika Nitin

Respondent(s)

Shivaji Mali Advocate - Shikare D.M.

Vishnu Mali

Hari Mali

Popat Mali

Dattu Mali

vitthal Mali

Maruti Mali

Balu Mali

Rukmini Gavdhare

Shalanbai Navale

Indrabai Mali

Gunabai Bhujbal

Laxman Dhavadkar(Legal Heir)

Anuradha Nade

Sagar Takale

Janabai Kale

Kusabai Raut

Baburav Mali

Manik shinde

Dnyandev Shinde

Suman Yadav

Housabai Borate

Vimal Shiraskar

Godabai Shinde

Sharad Barale

Ramesh Barale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. PANDHARPUR

07-05-2026

Hearing

18-04-2026

Hearing

04-04-2026

Hearing

13-03-2026

Hearing

05-03-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

09-08-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case 5/2018 Summary: The court allowed the decree holder's application to bring the legal heirs of the deceased opponent (who died on 20.05.2021) on record, with the legal heirs to be added within 7 days. However, the decree holder was ordered to pay Rs. 200 as costs for the delay in filing the application, as the court rejected his claim of being unaware of the death when the opponent was his neighbor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 5/2018 Summary: The court allowed the decree holder's application to bring the legal heirs of the deceased opponent (who died on 20.05.2021) on record, with the legal heirs to be added within 7 days. However, the decree holder was ordered to pay Rs. 200 as costs for the delay in filing the application, as the court rejected his claim of being unaware of the death when the opponent was his neighbor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case