Anil Gangaram Holkar vs Yashwantbhau Patil Gramin Bigar Sheti S P S Bhose — 53/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--PLAINT REJECTED on 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO060007702025
e-Filing Number
30-06-2025
Filing Number
790/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PLAINT REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anil Gangaram Holkar
Adv. SATALE NANDKUMAR PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
Yashwantbhau Patil Gramin Bigar Sheti S P S Bhose
Sahayak Nibandhak Sahakari Sanstha pandharpur
Recovery Officer Yashwantbhau Patil Gra B S S P Bhose
Yogesh Balasaheb Holkar
Vijay Bhagwat Holkar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Order |
| 23-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Anil Gangaram Holkar v. Yashwantbhau Patil Gramin Bigar Sheti S.P.S. (Case 53/2025) The court rejected the petition filed by Anil Holkar against a cooperative society and recovery officer, finding that courts lack jurisdiction to intervene in loan recovery matters governed by the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner borrowed ₹5,00,000 in 2012 from the cooperative institution and sought to challenge recovery proceedings initiated under Section 101 of the Act. The court determined that such recovery matters must be resolved through the statutory remedies provided under Sections 154-163 of the Cooperative Act rather than through civil court jurisdiction, and accordingly dismissed the petition as lacking legal foundation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Anil Gangaram Holkar v. Yashwantbhau Patil Gramin Bigar Sheti S.P.S. (Case 53/2025) The court rejected the petition filed by Anil Holkar against a cooperative society and recovery officer, finding that courts lack jurisdiction to intervene in loan recovery matters governed by the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner borrowed ₹5,00,000 in 2012 from the cooperative institution and sought to challenge recovery proceedings initiated under Section 101 of the Act. The court determined that such recovery matters must be resolved through the statutory remedies provided under Sections 154-163 of the Cooperative Act rather than through civil court jurisdiction, and accordingly dismissed the petition as lacking legal foundation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts