Madhukar Maruti Jagtap vs Hon. Collector, Solapur — 15/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 3439. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO060001922025
e-Filing Number
10-02-2025
Filing Number
195/2025
Filing Date
10-Feb-2025
Registration No
15/2025
Registration Date
10-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madhukar Maruti Jagtap
Adv. Sujata Ravindra Kshirsagar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hon. Collector, Solapur
-
2.Upvibhagiy Adhikari Mangalvedha
-
3.Tehsildar Mangalwedha
-
4.Mukhyadhikari Nagarparishad Mangalwedha
-
5.Pushpanjali Nandkumar Shinde
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
03-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
13-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
16-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
19-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
07-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
10-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
19-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
29-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
08-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
18-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 15/2025 Outcome: Application rejected. Dattatraya Nana Mali sought to be added as a defendant to the suit filed by Madhukar Jagtap against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant claimed his adjacent property (Gat No. 2365/2) would suffer irreparable loss from any court order regarding the suit property (Survey No. 963). The court rejected the application, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate any legal right in the suit property or establish he was a necessary party. The suit concerned only the plaintiff's ownership and possession of Gat No. 2368 and a challenge to an encroachment notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
11-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
20-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
13-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
-
09-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
02-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
24-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
11-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
04-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
21-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
17-Mar-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
07-Mar-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
28-Feb-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Pandharpur
-
13-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2025
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 15/2025 Outcome: Application rejected. Dattatraya Nana Mali sought to be added as a defendant to the suit filed by Madhukar Jagtap against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant claimed his adjacent property (Gat No. 2365/2) would suffer irreparable loss from any court order regarding the suit property (Survey No. 963). The court rejected the application, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate any legal right in the suit property or establish he was a necessary party. The suit concerned only the plaintiff's ownership and possession of Gat No. 2368 and a challenge to an encroachment notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts