Madhukar Maruti Jagtap vs Hon. Collector, Solapur — 15/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 3439. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO060001922025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2025
Filing Number
195/2025
Filing Date
10-02-2025
Registration No
15/2025
Registration Date
10-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhukar Maruti Jagtap
Adv. Sujata Ravindra Kshirsagar
Respondent(s)
Hon. Collector, Solapur
Upvibhagiy Adhikari Mangalvedha
Tehsildar Mangalwedha
Mukhyadhikari Nagarparishad Mangalwedha
Pushpanjali Nandkumar Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Pandharpur.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 15/2025 Outcome: Application rejected. Dattatraya Nana Mali sought to be added as a defendant to the suit filed by Madhukar Jagtap against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant claimed his adjacent property (Gat No. 2365/2) would suffer irreparable loss from any court order regarding the suit property (Survey No. 963). The court rejected the application, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate any legal right in the suit property or establish he was a necessary party. The suit concerned only the plaintiff's ownership and possession of Gat No. 2368 and a challenge to an encroachment notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 15/2025 Outcome: Application rejected. Dattatraya Nana Mali sought to be added as a defendant to the suit filed by Madhukar Jagtap against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant claimed his adjacent property (Gat No. 2365/2) would suffer irreparable loss from any court order regarding the suit property (Survey No. 963). The court rejected the application, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate any legal right in the suit property or establish he was a necessary party. The suit concerned only the plaintiff's ownership and possession of Gat No. 2368 and a challenge to an encroachment notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts