State of Maharashtra vs Prajakata Bhanudas More — 41/2022
Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(p)(q),3(2)(i),3(2)(ii). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Atro.Spl.Case - Special Case under Prevention of Atrocities Act
CNR: MHSO050020552022
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
1462/2022
Filing Date
27-12-2022
Registration No
41/2022
Registration Date
27-12-2022
Court
District Court , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
FIR Details
FIR Number
739
Police Station
Pandhrpur City Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Prajakata Bhanudas More
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary of Special Case (Atrocity) No. 41/2022 The Special Judge (Atrocity), Pandharpur ordered the removal of complainant Jayant Bokephode from the court hall on 30.07.2024 for misbehaviour and contemptuous conduct. After hearing arguments on a pending application (Exh.5), the court fixed the matter for order on 09.08.2024, but the complainant subsequently used rough language, pressurized the court for immediate orders, and refused to comply with court decorum despite warnings from the judge and APP. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Special Case (Atrocity) No. 41/2022 The Special Judge (Atrocity), Pandharpur ordered the removal of complainant Jayant Bokephode from the court hall on 30.07.2024 for misbehaviour and contemptuous conduct. After hearing arguments on a pending application (Exh.5), the court fixed the matter for order on 09.08.2024, but the complainant subsequently used rough language, pressurized the court for immediate orders, and refused to comply with court decorum despite warnings from the judge and APP. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts