State of Maharashtra 3 vs Narayan Pandurang Suryavanshi Advocate - Dharurkar K.B., Dharurkar K.B. — 150/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHSO050018492025

Filing Number

1320/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

150/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

District Court , Pandhurpur

Judge

1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

610

Police Station

Pandhrpur City Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra 3

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narayan Pandurang Suryavanshi Advocate - Dharurkar K.B., Dharurkar K.B.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Pandurang Suryawanshi (S.C. No. 150/2025) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (attempt to murder) despite evidence confirming a knife attack occurred on September 24, 2025, injuring both the informant and her husband with serious neck wounds. The critical failure was the prosecution's inability to establish the accused's identity as the assailant—all four prosecution witnesses, including the injured victims and eyewitnesses, testified to the incident but explicitly stated they could not identify who committed the assault. The court found that mere circumstantial evidence (immediate arrest, seized weapon, blood-stained clothes) and medical documentation of injuries were insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without reliable eyewitness identification of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  4. 06-May-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  5. 02-May-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  13. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  14. 17-Jan-2026

    Charge

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  15. 03-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Pandurang Suryawanshi (S.C. No. 150/2025) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (attempt to murder) despite evidence confirming a knife attack occurred on September 24, 2025, injuring both the informant and her husband with serious neck wounds. The critical failure was the prosecution's inability to establish the accused's identity as the assailant—all four prosecution witnesses, including the injured victims and eyewitnesses, testified to the incident but explicitly stated they could not identify who committed the assault. The court found that mere circumstantial evidence (immediate arrest, seized weapon, blood-stained clothes) and medical documentation of injuries were insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without reliable eyewitness identification of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case