Sub Divisional Officer vs Mahadev Sidram Lendave 16 Advocate - Marathe Vijay Bhaskar — 85/2021
Case under Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act Section 3(H)(4). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHSO050016482021
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
494/2021
Filing Date
23-10-2021
Registration No
85/2021
Registration Date
23-10-2021
Court
District Court , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Divisional Officer
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Mahadev Sidram Lendave 16 Advocate - Marathe Vijay Bhaskar
Ankush Shrimant Lendave
Adv. Deshmukh Amar B
Santosh Shrimant Lendave
Adv. Deshmukh Amar B
Ambubai Waman Gaikwad
Adv. Deshmukh Amar B
Chaya Maruti Shinde
Adv. Deshmukh Amar B
Subhadra Shrimant Lendave
Adv. Deshmukh Amar B
Chandrashekhar Mahadev Patil
Adv. Kadam Vishal Shankar
Hausabai Dhondiram Yadav
Suresh Ramchandra Lendave
Shivaji Dagadu Lendave
Sulochana Mahadev Patil
Sushila Mahadev Patil
Ranjeet Mahadev Patil
Arvind Mahadev Patil
Parinita Chandrashekhar Patil
Adv. Kulkarni A. A.
Bhawani Pratap Chandrashekhar Patil
Adv. Kulkarni A. A.
Tulsi Chandrashekhar Patil
Adv. Kulkarni A. A.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: LAR No. 85/2021 The District Judge rejected an application challenging a land acquisition reference under the National Highways Act, 1956. The Sub-Divisional Officer of Mangalwedha had referred a dispute regarding ownership and compensation apportionment (Rs. 36,70,920/-) for acquired land in Gat No. 690 to the court, as multiple claimants disputed the entitlement share. The court upheld the referral as valid, finding the competent authority had proper cause of action under Section 3H(4) of the Act due to existing disputes between landowners and a pending civil suit regarding ownership. The court dismissed the petitioner's arguments that the authority lacked jurisdiction or formal order-making authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: LAR No. 85/2021 The District Judge rejected an application challenging a land acquisition reference under the National Highways Act, 1956. The Sub-Divisional Officer of Mangalwedha had referred a dispute regarding ownership and compensation apportionment (Rs. 36,70,920/-) for acquired land in Gat No. 690 to the court, as multiple claimants disputed the entitlement share. The court upheld the referral as valid, finding the competent authority had proper cause of action under Section 3H(4) of the Act due to existing disputes between landowners and a pending civil suit regarding ownership. The court dismissed the petitioner's arguments that the authority lacked jurisdiction or formal order-making authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts