State of Maharashtra vs Manisha Bhima Dhane Advocate - Yadav D. A. — 69/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,120B. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSO050012022021
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
900/2021
Filing Date
12-08-2021
Registration No
69/2021
Registration Date
13-08-2021
Court
District Court , Pandhurpur
Judge
12-Distirct Judge-4 and Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
Mangalwedha Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Manisha Bhima Dhane Advocate - Yadav D. A.
Aananda Tukaram Honmukhe
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Distirct Judge-4 and Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Evidence
Evidence
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 30-10-2025 | Hearing |
| 16-10-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected accused Manisha Bhima Dhane's applications seeking transfer from Kolhapur Central Prison to Solapur District Prison. The court found that the accused was positively involved in killing Bhima (allegedly with co-accused Aananda) through strangulation due to objections to an illicit relationship, and that prison authorities had administratively transferred her to Kolhapur based on accommodation and facility availability. The court held that accused has no right to choose her detention prison and dismissed her pleas citing gravity of charges, positive involvement, and adequate medical facilities at Kolhapur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected accused Manisha Bhima Dhane's applications seeking transfer from Kolhapur Central Prison to Solapur District Prison. The court found that the accused was positively involved in killing Bhima (allegedly with co-accused Aananda) through strangulation due to objections to an illicit relationship, and that prison authorities had administratively transferred her to Kolhapur based on accommodation and facility availability. The court held that accused has no right to choose her detention prison and dismissed her pleas citing gravity of charges, positive involvement, and adequate medical facilities at Kolhapur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts