Suresh Shivaji Mudgul vs Saraswati Gorakh Mohite, Etc. Advocate - Kolekar R.S. — 68/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO050009142025

e-Filing Number

25-06-2025

Filing Number

307/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

68/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Court

District Court , Pandhurpur

Judge

10-District Judge-2 and Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Shivaji Mudgul

    Adv. Ashishkumar Anil More

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saraswati Gorakh Mohite, Etc. Advocate - Kolekar R.S.

  2. 2.Rahul Gorakh Mohite

  3. 3.Pankaj Gorakh Mohite

  4. 4.Sharda Anand Mohite

  5. 5.Omkar Anand Mohite

  6. 6.Pranav Anand Mohite

  7. 7.Hirabai Bhimrao Mohite

  8. 8.Amol Bhimrao Mohite

  9. 9.Asha Deepak Pawar

  10. 10.Kalapana Uttam Mohite

  11. 11.Sandeep Uttam Mohite

  12. 12.Sapna Jagan Pawar

  13. 13.Sonali Nilesh Mane

  14. 14.Sumabai Tukaram Pawar

  15. 15.Mangal Bhimrao Jadhav

  16. 16.Sakhubai Gyanoba Jadhav

  17. 17.Tanaji Annappa Mudgul

  18. 18.Sunita Bajrang Chawan

  19. 19.Manohar Shivaji Mudgul

  20. 20.Savita Shrikant Pawar

  21. 21.Sadhana Shrikant Pawar Mainar Guardian Savita

  22. 22.Sagar Shrikant Pawar Mainar Guardian Savita

  23. 23.Rohit Shrikant Pawar Mainar Guardian Savita

  24. 24.Nikita Shrikant Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The District Judge allowed Suresh Shivaji Mudgul's application to condone delay in filing an appeal against an order granting a legal heir certificate to respondents over disputed land in Solapur. The court found the delay was unintentional, citing that the applicant was not made a party to the original proceeding despite her name being in revenue records, and that personal hardships (father-in-law's death, sick aunt) contributed to the delay. The appeal was ordered to be registered for merit consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 and Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Extra Joint District Judge and A.s.j., Pandharpur.

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Extra Joint District Judge and A.s.j., Pandharpur.

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Extra Joint District Judge and A.s.j., Pandharpur.

  8. 10-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  10. 01-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Ad-hoc Distirct Judge-2 And Additional Session Pandharpur

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  16. 02-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc Dist Judge- 1 Add. Sessions Judge Pandharpur

  17. 27-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 25-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge allowed Suresh Shivaji Mudgul's application to condone delay in filing an appeal against an order granting a legal heir certificate to respondents over disputed land in Solapur. The court found the delay was unintentional, citing that the applicant was not made a party to the original proceeding despite her name being in revenue records, and that personal hardships (father-in-law's death, sick aunt) contributed to the delay. The appeal was ordered to be registered for merit consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case