Muktabai Unhale vs Maruti Unhale — 92/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 374. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHSO050007602018
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
Filing Number
333/2018
Filing Date
14-06-2018
Registration No
92/2018
Registration Date
15-06-2018
Court
District Court , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muktabai Unhale
Adv. Deshmukh Vilasrao Damodar
Lata Salunkhe
Adv. Deshmukh Vilasrao Damodar
Respondent(s)
Maruti Unhale
Savitribai Unhale
Sheetal Unhale
Madhuri Unhale
Sujata Nirmal
Bai Unhale
Mangal Nirmal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 06-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 05-12-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
| 07-11-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 92/2018 The appeal filed by Muktabai Unhale and Lata Salunkhe challenging an order regarding property transfer rights has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any legal basis to challenge the respondents' (Maruti Unhale, Savitribai Unhale, and Sheetal Unhale) rights to the property, which was lawfully transferred to them on 07.01.2009. Since the property transfer occurred over seven years before the appeal was filed, the petitioners' claims for future acquisition rights were deemed time-barred and without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 92/2018 The appeal filed by Muktabai Unhale and Lata Salunkhe challenging an order regarding property transfer rights has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any legal basis to challenge the respondents' (Maruti Unhale, Savitribai Unhale, and Sheetal Unhale) rights to the property, which was lawfully transferred to them on 07.01.2009. Since the property transfer occurred over seven years before the appeal was filed, the petitioners' claims for future acquisition rights were deemed time-barred and without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts