Ranjana Shinde vs Sunanda Lohar — 14/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHSO050005742020
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
Filing Number
223/2020
Filing Date
23-03-2020
Registration No
14/2020
Registration Date
21-04-2020
Court
District Court , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ranjana Shinde
Adv. Raut M. M.
Sagar Shinde
Respondent(s)
Sunanda Lohar
Raju Koli
Ranjit Budhner
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 14/2020 Opponent No. 1 (Sunanda Lohar) sought to set aside a "no say and no written statement" order passed against her for failing to file her written statement by the required date. The court allowed the application and set aside the order, accepting that Covid-19 lockdown circumstances partially justified the delay, though finding some negligence on her part for not providing documentary evidence of claimed medical treatment. She was ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 in costs to the applicants as a condition for reinstating her written statement on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 14/2020 Opponent No. 1 (Sunanda Lohar) sought to set aside a "no say and no written statement" order passed against her for failing to file her written statement by the required date. The court allowed the application and set aside the order, accepting that Covid-19 lockdown circumstances partially justified the delay, though finding some negligence on her part for not providing documentary evidence of claimed medical treatment. She was ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 in costs to the applicants as a condition for reinstating her written statement on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts