Shivaji Soma Aakale(Legal Heir) vs Raju Vitthal Birajdar — 5/2023

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO050000872023

Evidence

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

45/2023

Filing Date

13-01-2023

Registration No

5/2023

Registration Date

16-01-2023

Court

District Court , Pandhurpur

Judge

10-District Judge-2 and Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Shivaji Soma Aakale(Legal Heir)

Adv. Shinde Ranjeet N1.

Vhanavabai Shivaji Aakale Birajdar 1.

Ramchandra Shivaji Aakale Birajdar

Adv. Pawar Shirish Rajaram1.

Laxman Shivaji Aakale Birajdar 1.

Sangita Ramkrushna Khot

Respondent(s)

Raju Vitthal Birajdar

Sushila Tanaji Narale

Kalabai Vitthal Birajdar

Hearing History

Judge: 10-District Judge-2 and Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur

27-03-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

16-01-2026

Evidence

12-12-2025

Evidence

03-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

15-04-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Civil Misc. Appln. No. 05/2023 The application seeking delay condonation and stay of a partition decree was rejected by the Ad-hoc District Judge, Pandharpur on 15-04-2023. The court found that the applicants (legal heirs of deceased Shivaji Soma Aakale) had engaged in prolonged delaying tactics across 23 years of litigation and were not entitled to stay the decree favoring the respondents' half share in the property. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Civil Misc. Appln. No. 05/2023 The application seeking delay condonation and stay of a partition decree was rejected by the Ad-hoc District Judge, Pandharpur on 15-04-2023. The court found that the applicants (legal heirs of deceased Shivaji Soma Aakale) had engaged in prolonged delaying tactics across 23 years of litigation and were not entitled to stay the decree favoring the respondents' half share in the property. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Court , Pandhurpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case