City Traffic Branch (South) vs Chavan Samrat — 15210/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 184C, 129/194D. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO040152112024
Filing Number
15211/2024
Filing Date
22-Oct-2024
Registration No
15210/2024
Registration Date
22-Oct-2024
Court
Municipal Court, Solapur
Judge
2-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.City Traffic Branch (South)
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chavan Samrat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Solapur Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed the summary case filed by City Traffic Branch (South) against Chavan Samrat, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and discharging the accused. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities, the police failed to secure the accused's presence, resulting in no progress in the case, making it appropriate for closure during the special drive ordered by the Bombay High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
23-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
01-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
08-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
31-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
-
03-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
-
17-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
04-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
04-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 15210/2024
The Solapur Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed the summary case filed by City Traffic Branch (South) against Chavan Samrat, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and discharging the accused. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities, the police failed to secure the accused's presence, resulting in no progress in the case, making it appropriate for closure during the special drive ordered by the Bombay High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts