City Traffic Branch (North) vs Uppin Prabhudev — 13691/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 130(1)/177. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO040136472024
Filing Number
13647/2024
Filing Date
23-Aug-2024
Registration No
13691/2024
Registration Date
23-Aug-2024
Court
Municipal Court, Solapur
Judge
2-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.City Traffic Branch (North)
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Uppin Prabhudev
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 13691/2024 The Solapur Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed the traffic case filed by City Traffic Branch (North) against Uppin Prabhudev on 13/03/2026, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023. The court found that the accused remained continuously absent despite sufficient opportunities, the police failed to secure his presence, and the summary case had made no progress, making dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
07-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
15-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
15-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
21-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
07-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
20-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Munpl.Solapur
-
30-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 13691/2024
Summary of Case 13691/2024 The Solapur Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed the traffic case filed by City Traffic Branch (North) against Uppin Prabhudev on 13/03/2026, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023. The court found that the accused remained continuously absent despite sufficient opportunities, the police failed to secure his presence, and the summary case had made no progress, making dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts