The State of Maharashtra vs Director of M/s. Q.I. Group of companies Maleshiya and 28 others — 3/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,403,417,409,34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHSO010038782018

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

1515/2018

Filing Date

12-07-2018

Registration No

3/2018

Registration Date

13-07-2018

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

2-District Judge - 3 and Additional Session Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

555

Police Station

Vijapur Naka

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,403,417,409,34
Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Director of M/s. Q.I. Group of companies Maleshiya and 28 others

Director of Q Net India Limited group of company Hongcong

Director of M/s.Vihan Direct Selling india Pv.Ltd.Benglor State-Karnatak

Director of M/s Vanmala Hotels Travels and Tourisum Services Pvt.Ltd.Mumbai

Director of M/s Transvihv Interprises India Pv.Ltd. Benglore State-Karnataka.

Director M/s.The V Maleshiya

Goutam Dhuru

Rohan Kohali

Battul Lokhandwala

Siddheshwar Mittha

Jitendra Waichal

Satish Patil

Mohan Chavdekar

Malkam Desai

Maykal Josef Thomas Ferera

Surynarayan Vijaysarathi

Ravindranath Wahal Padam

Pramodas Kurup

Muhamad Imtiyaj

Diliprao Pukkella Baraka

Stivansan Byarij

Shriniwas Movva

Balsubramanyan Laxminarayan

Amit Kamdar

Shahin Moulana

Mohmmad Moulana

Josef Bismark

Vijay Ishwaran

Panthman Senathiraja

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Judge - 3 and Additional Session Judge

16-05-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

28-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

31-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

25-09-2018
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Special Case (MPID) No. 03/2018 Outcome: Bail application REJECTED. Mohan Ramkrushna Chavdekar's second regular bail application was rejected by Additional Sessions Judge M.V. Morale on 25 September 2018. The court found prima facie evidence that Chavdekar, along with co-accused persons, induced complainant Santosh Subhash Surwase and other investors to invest ₹1,04,66,768 in a QNET multilevel marketing scheme by promising lucrative returns, then misappropriated the funds. The court classified this as a serious socio-economic offense causing irreparable societal harm and determined bail was not warranted given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 409, 403, 417, 420 and MPID Act Sections 3-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Special Case (MPID) No. 03/2018 Outcome: Bail application REJECTED. Mohan Ramkrushna Chavdekar's second regular bail application was rejected by Additional Sessions Judge M.V. Morale on 25 September 2018. The court found prima facie evidence that Chavdekar, along with co-accused persons, induced complainant Santosh Subhash Surwase and other investors to invest ₹1,04,66,768 in a QNET multilevel marketing scheme by promising lucrative returns, then misappropriated the funds. The court classified this as a serious socio-economic offense causing irreparable societal harm and determined bail was not warranted given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 409, 403, 417, 420 and MPID Act Sections 3-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case