Digambar Dattatray Salglar vs Brijgopal Bhagwandas Tapadiya Advocate - Deshpande Sushil Sudhir — 116/2025

Case Summary: MCA 116/2025 Court Decision: The District Judge dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the trial court's rejection of the temporary injunction application. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience for granting temporary injunction. Key Reasoning: The court held that while the defendant's property field number was changed from Gat No.146/2 to Gat No.146/1 through a mutation entry sanctioned by competent authority, this change alone did not constitute illegal conduct requiring injunction. The court found no material evidence showing the defendant was actually obstructing the plaintiff's possession or illegally attempting to grab the plaintiff's suit property. Mere measurement of the defendant's property by revenue authorities and erection of a compound wall on the defendant's own land did not amount to disturbance of the plaintiff's peaceful possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.