The State of Maharashtra vs Elizabeth @ Rekha Sushil Hibale etc- — 361/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 370(2)(3). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSO010034452023
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
2372/2023
Filing Date
27-11-2023
Registration No
361/2023
Registration Date
28-11-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
266
Police Station
Sadar Bazar
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP P.M. Rajput
Respondent(s)
Elizabeth @ Rekha Sushil Hibale etc-
Jafar A.Raheman Bagewadi
Rakesh Raju Shriyal
Rohit Gurung @ VVN Mathyu Disoza
Saipan Ansar Bagwan
Swapnaja Anuj Sharma
Sayyadmasud Gajanfarali Khatib
Anuj Krushnadatta Sharma
Ranaveer (full name not known)-Abscond
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 361/2023 Accused No. 8 Anuj Krishnadatta Sharma's application for discharge was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against him for offences under IPC Section 370(2)(3) and ITPA Sections 3, 4, 5, 7, noting victims were found on his premises and he knowingly allowed a spa to operate illegally without reporting to police. The case will proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 361/2023 Accused No. 8 Anuj Krishnadatta Sharma's application for discharge was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence against him for offences under IPC Section 370(2)(3) and ITPA Sections 3, 4, 5, 7, noting victims were found on his premises and he knowingly allowed a spa to operate illegally without reporting to police. The case will proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts