Shripad Diliprao Valupante vs Anant alias Anantrao Govind Deshmukh — 264/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO010029532025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-09-2025

Filing Number

1069/2025

Filing Date

25-09-2025

Registration No

264/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 24

Petitioner(s)

Shripad Diliprao Valupante

Respondent(s)

Anant alias Anantrao Govind Deshmukh

Amol Anant alias Anantrao Deshmukh

Abhay Anant alias Anantrao Deshmukh

Kedar Diliprao Valupante

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

25-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Order

17-03-2026

Order

13-03-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Principal District Judge, Solapur rejected petitioner Shripad Diliprao Valupante's application seeking transfer of Civil Suit No. 579/2024 from the trial court on grounds of judicial bias. The court found all allegations against the trial judge baseless after examining court records, noting significant discrepancies between the petitioner's claims and actual case documents. The court held that suggesting amicable settlement through mediation, rather than demonstrating bias, reflects the judge's statutory obligation to promote dispute resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District Judge, Solapur rejected petitioner Shripad Diliprao Valupante's application seeking transfer of Civil Suit No. 579/2024 from the trial court on grounds of judicial bias. The court found all allegations against the trial judge baseless after examining court records, noting significant discrepancies between the petitioner's claims and actual case documents. The court held that suggesting amicable settlement through mediation, rather than demonstrating bias, reflects the judge's statutory obligation to promote dispute resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case