Shripad Diliprao Valupante vs Anant alias Anantrao Govind Deshmukh — 264/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO010029532025
e-Filing Number
22-09-2025
Filing Number
1069/2025
Filing Date
25-09-2025
Registration No
264/2025
Registration Date
26-09-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shripad Diliprao Valupante
Respondent(s)
Anant alias Anantrao Govind Deshmukh
Amol Anant alias Anantrao Deshmukh
Abhay Anant alias Anantrao Deshmukh
Kedar Diliprao Valupante
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District Judge, Solapur rejected petitioner Shripad Diliprao Valupante's application seeking transfer of Civil Suit No. 579/2024 from the trial court on grounds of judicial bias. The court found all allegations against the trial judge baseless after examining court records, noting significant discrepancies between the petitioner's claims and actual case documents. The court held that suggesting amicable settlement through mediation, rather than demonstrating bias, reflects the judge's statutory obligation to promote dispute resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District Judge, Solapur rejected petitioner Shripad Diliprao Valupante's application seeking transfer of Civil Suit No. 579/2024 from the trial court on grounds of judicial bias. The court found all allegations against the trial judge baseless after examining court records, noting significant discrepancies between the petitioner's claims and actual case documents. The court held that suggesting amicable settlement through mediation, rather than demonstrating bias, reflects the judge's statutory obligation to promote dispute resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts