Mahadev Amrut Mane vs M/s. IndusInd Bank Limited Solapur Through Its Legal Exe. Shridhar S. Rahul Advocate - Raool Shridhar Sambmurti — 181/2025
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO010021172025
e-Filing Number
02-07-2025
Filing Number
757/2025
Filing Date
03-Jul-2025
Registration No
181/2025
Registration Date
07-Jul-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahadev Amrut Mane
Adv. Kanaki A. S.
-
2.Shivala Mahadev Mane
Adv. Kanaki A. S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/s. IndusInd Bank Limited Solapur Through Its Legal Exe. Shridhar S. Rahul Advocate - Raool Shridhar Sambmurti
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Principal District Judge, Solapur allowed the applicants' plea to condone a 4-year, 3-month delay in filing an application against an arbitral award dated April 12, 2021. The court found that the applicants were genuinely unaware of the arbitration proceedings because notice was never properly served—postal notices addressed to the applicants were marked "address incomplete" and returned. The arbitration proceeded ex parte without any alternative service method (such as newspaper publication) being attempted. The court held that the cause of delay (lack of notice) rather than its duration justified condonation, entitling the applicants to challenge the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2025
Notice_Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 181/2025
The Principal District Judge, Solapur allowed the applicants' plea to condone a 4-year, 3-month delay in filing an application against an arbitral award dated April 12, 2021. The court found that the applicants were genuinely unaware of the arbitration proceedings because notice was never properly served—postal notices addressed to the applicants were marked "address incomplete" and returned. The arbitration proceeded ex parte without any alternative service method (such as newspaper publication) being attempted. The court held that the cause of delay (lack of notice) rather than its duration justified condonation, entitling the applicants to challenge the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts