The State of Maharashtra vs Abhijit Alias Lalya Maulali Jadhav — 115/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 399,402. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSO010017222025
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
1173/2025
Filing Date
23-05-2025
Registration No
115/2025
Registration Date
23-05-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
8-District Judge - 1 and Additional Session Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
181
Police Station
Vijapur Naka
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP P.M.Rajput
Respondent(s)
Abhijit Alias Lalya Maulali Jadhav
Shivaling Vitthal Jadhav
Rahul Nagnath Jadhav
Amol Alias Somnath Dipak Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge - 1 and Additional Session Judge
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 21-05-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 18-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 21-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: Sessions Case 115/2025 Amol @ Somnath Dipak Jadhav was arrested on 18.12.2024 for offences under IPC Sections 399 and 402 (dacoity-related charges) in connection with an alleged planned dacoity near D. Pharmacy College, Solapur. The court's bail application on 11.06.2025 was granted. The applicant was released on PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety in the like amount, with conditions that he furnish proof of permanent and temporary addresses, not tamper with witnesses, and not abscond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: Sessions Case 115/2025 Amol @ Somnath Dipak Jadhav was arrested on 18.12.2024 for offences under IPC Sections 399 and 402 (dacoity-related charges) in connection with an alleged planned dacoity near D. Pharmacy College, Solapur. The court's bail application on 11.06.2025 was granted. The applicant was released on PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety in the like amount, with conditions that he furnish proof of permanent and temporary addresses, not tamper with witnesses, and not abscond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts