The State of Maharashtra vs Prasad Mahadev Londhe — 84/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),189(2),189(3),191(1),191(2),191(3),190,324(3),(4),352,351(2),(3),61(2),119(1). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSO010012342025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
812/2025
Filing Date
07-04-2025
Registration No
84/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
2-District Judge - 3 and Additional Session Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
447
Police Station
Vijapur Naka
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP P.M.Rajput
Respondent(s)
Prasad Mahadev Londhe
Kedar Nitin Gumate
Sagar Sunil Kadam
Ajinkya Sidram Shahabade
Arjun Alias Banti Ramesh Kamble
Ufaran alias Papya Munir Golandaj
Shriniwas Alias Mataya Ramesh Mane
Audumbar Alias Balu Prakash Kale
Manoj Alias Bhaji Bibhishan Surerao
Prakash Alias Budha Ramchandr Shinde -AbscondBNSS - 335
Hrishabh Alias Jacky Changdev Shripati Thorat -Abscond BNSS - 335
Vinayak Jadhav BNSS - Abscond 335
Sohel Mulla BNSS -Abscond 335
Viresh Swami BNSS - Abscond 335
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge - 3 and Additional Session Judge
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 15-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 14-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-04-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 84/2025 Accused Arjun @ Banti Ramesh Kamble's bail application was allowed. The court granted regular bail after finding prima facie evidence suggests the case involves an accident with unexplained delay in FIR lodging, and the accused's name was absent from original FIR and complainant statements. Bail conditions include Rs. 1,00,000 PR bond with sureties, prohibition from contacting witnesses, and mandatory trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 84/2025 Accused Arjun @ Banti Ramesh Kamble's bail application was allowed. The court granted regular bail after finding prima facie evidence suggests the case involves an accident with unexplained delay in FIR lodging, and the accused's name was absent from original FIR and complainant statements. Bail conditions include Rs. 1,00,000 PR bond with sureties, prohibition from contacting witnesses, and mandatory trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts