Balasaheb Kashinath Banagar vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 204/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,121(1),118(1),189,190,191,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010006492026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

412/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

204/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

127

Police Station

Karmala

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,121(1),118(1),189,190,191,351(2),352
Right of Persons with Disabilities Act Section 92
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balasaheb Kashinath Banagar

    Adv. Patil Nitin Tanaji

  2. 2.Vitthal Vishambar Alias Vishwanath Bandgar Alias Banagar

    Adv. Patil Nitin Tanaji

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application of Balasaheb Kashinath Banagar and Vitthal Vishambar Bandgar, who faced charges for obstructing official work, assault, and violations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The court found that since other co-accused were already arrested, evidence seized, and investigation nearly complete, continued detention served no purpose and posed minimal risk of witness tampering. Both applicants were granted bail upon executing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 15,000 each, subject to reporting to Karmala police station twice weekly until charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  9. 31-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  11. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  12. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  13. 23-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  14. 20-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  15. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  16. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  17. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application of Balasaheb Kashinath Banagar and Vitthal Vishambar Bandgar, who faced charges for obstructing official work, assault, and violations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The court found that since other co-accused were already arrested, evidence seized, and investigation nearly complete, continued detention served no purpose and posed minimal risk of witness tampering. Both applicants were granted bail upon executing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 15,000 each, subject to reporting to Karmala police station twice weekly until charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case