Shabnam Paigambar Shaikh vs Paigambar Maula Shaikh — 65/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO010005772026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
262/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
65/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shabnam Paigambar Shaikh
Adv. Kadage I. M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Paigambar Maula Shaikh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The District Court, Solapur allowed Ms. Shabnam Paigambar Shaikh's application to transfer her pending divorce case (R.C.S. No. 834/2025) from the Malshiras court to the Pandharpur court. The court found the transfer justified because the applicant had relocated over 50 km away, had no family support for court attendance, and lacked income, with the respondent offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Notice_Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Notice_Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2026
The District Court, Solapur allowed Ms. Shabnam Paigambar Shaikh's application to transfer her pending divorce case (R.C.S. No. 834/2025) from the Malshiras court to the Pandharpur court. The court found the transfer justified because the applicant had relocated over 50 km away, had no family support for court attendance, and lacked income, with the respondent offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts