Mustafa A. Ajij Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 178/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 18th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010005702026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

178/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

93

Police Station

Aklakot North

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,318,351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Mustafa A. Ajij Shaikh

Adv. Navgire Prashant Pralhad

Gulam Rasum A Ajit Shaikh

Adv. Navgire Prashant Pralhad

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Arguments

13-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

07-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted anticipatory bail to both applicants in a land transaction dispute, finding the underlying dispute to be civil rather than criminal in nature. The court noted that the applicants' civil suit had already been rejected and appealed, and that the earnest money cheque was never encashed, contradicting criminal allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The applicants were released on bail with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to both applicants in a land transaction dispute, finding the underlying dispute to be civil rather than criminal in nature. The court noted that the applicants' civil suit had already been rejected and appealed, and that the earnest money cheque was never encashed, contradicting criminal allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The applicants were released on bail with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case