Mustafa A. Ajij Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 178/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010005702026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

178/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

93

Police Station

Aklakot North

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,318,351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mustafa A. Ajij Shaikh

    Adv. Navgire Prashant Pralhad

  2. 2.Gulam Rasum A Ajit Shaikh

    Adv. Navgire Prashant Pralhad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to both applicants in a land transaction dispute, finding the underlying dispute to be civil rather than criminal in nature. The court noted that the applicants' civil suit had already been rejected and appealed, and that the earnest money cheque was never encashed, contradicting criminal allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The applicants were released on bail with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to both applicants in a land transaction dispute, finding the underlying dispute to be civil rather than criminal in nature. The court noted that the applicants' civil suit had already been rejected and appealed, and that the earnest money cheque was never encashed, contradicting criminal allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The applicants were released on bail with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case