Ramu Vyankatesh Shet vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 177/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 31st March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010005692026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
355/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
177/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
Police Station
Jodbhavi Peth
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramu Vyankatesh Shet
Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.
Laxman Vyankatesh Shet
Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.
Vivek Shrikant Bhandarkavtekar
Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.
Prakash Shivaji Pawar
Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 177/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur rejected the bail application filed by four applicants on 31 March 2026. The applicants sought protection and a directive requiring Jodbhavi Peth Police Station to provide 48 hours' advance notice before arrest, claiming they feared false FIR registration following alleged police assault and coercion on 28-29 November 2025. The court held that such relief cannot be granted, citing Supreme Court precedent (*Vijaykumar Gopichand Ramchandani v. Amar Sadhuram Mulchandani*) establishing that courts cannot issue advance notice directives before arrests in cognizable offences, particularly when no FIR has been registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 177/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur rejected the bail application filed by four applicants on 31 March 2026. The applicants sought protection and a directive requiring Jodbhavi Peth Police Station to provide 48 hours' advance notice before arrest, claiming they feared false FIR registration following alleged police assault and coercion on 28-29 November 2025. The court held that such relief cannot be granted, citing Supreme Court precedent (*Vijaykumar Gopichand Ramchandani v. Amar Sadhuram Mulchandani*) establishing that courts cannot issue advance notice directives before arrests in cognizable offences, particularly when no FIR has been registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts