Ramu Vyankatesh Shet vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 177/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010005692026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

355/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

177/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Jodbhavi Peth

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramu Vyankatesh Shet

    Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.

  2. 2.Laxman Vyankatesh Shet

    Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.

  3. 3.Vivek Shrikant Bhandarkavtekar

    Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.

  4. 4.Prakash Shivaji Pawar

    Adv. Jadhav Ajinkya R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 177/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur rejected the bail application filed by four applicants on 31 March 2026. The applicants sought protection and a directive requiring Jodbhavi Peth Police Station to provide 48 hours' advance notice before arrest, claiming they feared false FIR registration following alleged police assault and coercion on 28-29 November 2025. The court held that such relief cannot be granted, citing Supreme Court precedent (*Vijaykumar Gopichand Ramchandani v. Amar Sadhuram Mulchandani*) establishing that courts cannot issue advance notice directives before arrests in cognizable offences, particularly when no FIR has been registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

  10. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 177/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur rejected the bail application filed by four applicants on 31 March 2026. The applicants sought protection and a directive requiring Jodbhavi Peth Police Station to provide 48 hours' advance notice before arrest, claiming they feared false FIR registration following alleged police assault and coercion on 28-29 November 2025. The court held that such relief cannot be granted, citing Supreme Court precedent (*Vijaykumar Gopichand Ramchandani v. Amar Sadhuram Mulchandani*) establishing that courts cannot issue advance notice directives before arrests in cognizable offences, particularly when no FIR has been registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case